Video games have a bad year on Kickstarter

Polygon has an interesting piece up this week covering trends in crowdfunding projects… and the news isn’t that great for video games.

According to the article, the total income from Kickstarter projects declined 5.8% in 2016 from the year previous, while funds raised by successful video game Kickstarters were down a whopping 60% compared to 2015. The data they pulled showed that successful video game projects pulled in a collective $41.5M in 2015 — but only $17.6M in 2016.

Part of the reason behind this is the competition with other crowdfunding sites, such as Fig and IndieGoGo, which has pulled some of the attention and projects away from Kickstarter. The article also speculates that gamers might are becoming fatigued with such campaigns and disillusioned with the end results.

Source: Polygon
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Code of Conduct | Edit Your Profile | Commenting FAQ | Badge Reclamation | Badge Key

LEAVE A COMMENT

32 Comments on "Video games have a bad year on Kickstarter"

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most liked
Subscribe to:
Duane_Does_not_check_email
Reader
Duane_Does_not_check_email

Everything runs its course- even mmo’s themselves and eventually the industry

Reader
Droniac

Kickstarter fatigue may play a part, but I don’t think that’s the major reason why Kickstarter’s numbers are down for video games. The core reason is likely simply a lack of high-profile video game projects on Kickstarter.

I can only recall two high-profile Kickstarter projects in 2016 and both were relatively low-key:

  • System Shock remake (awesome, but only raised 1.35 million)
  • Chronicles of Elyria (doomed, but still managed 1.35 million)

That’s it, for the entire year! [afaik]

Meanwhile, here are just a few of the more high-profile kickstarters in 2015:

  • Shenmue 3 (6.3 million)
  • Bloodstained (wut? 5.5 million)
  • Divinity: Original Sin 2 (Overwhelmingly Positive on Steam with 2 million)
  • Crowfall (1.7 million)
  • BattleTech (BEST OF 2015, but ‘only’ 2.8 million)
  • Yooka-Laylee (how did this get 2 million?)
  • The Bard’s Tale 4 (1.5 million)
  • numerous other million+ video game projects

Yet the two high-profile crowdfunding projects in 2016 both still did very well:

  • Wasteland 3 (naturally hit 3.1 million)
  • Psychonauts 2 (easily hit 3.8 million)

on Fig.

Kickstarter funded 388 games for 17.6 million in 2016.
Fig, a new platform, funded 6 games for 7.8 million in 2016.

So it looks like people are still perfectly willing to invest big in video game projects. As long as they’re high-profile. Which isn’t any different from 2015, or 2014, or 2013, or 2012. Without those high-profile projects, however, there are fewer eyeballs on the site, which also means less funding for the smaller projects. Hence Kickstarter’s 2015 slump.

Fig’s current big crowdfunding project, Pillars of Eternity 2, also seems to be contradicting the “kickstarter fatigue” notion. It’s sitting at almost 2.3 million after nearly 10 days of funding. Project Eternity in 2012 was the most-funded project of its time. It only just hit 2 million after its 10th day (see Kicktraq). So yeah, the 2017 sequel-project is currently outperforming its 2012 predecessor.

I think the perception people have of crowdfunding is largely dependent on their experiences with it. My experiences have been largely positive. Every project I’ve backed has either delivered or is in production and only 3 or 4 have delivered bad or incomplete products. The rest have all been success stories, like: FTL, The Banner Saga, Wasteland 2, Valdis Story, Shadowrun Returns, Republique, Grim Dawn, Legends of Eisenwald, Defense Grid 2, Planetary Annihilation, Pillars of Eternity, Strike Suit Zero, Elite: Dangerous, Divinity: Original Sin…

Reader
MesaSage

I think it has everything to do with fatigue. People are tired of funding the whimsy of the unscrupulous and untalented.

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

I agree. Star Citizen is to blame. When CIG left Kickstarter and opened up their own pledge site, things began to go down hill from there. Other companies who were raking in cash donations began opening up their own sites as well and Kickstarter was left out with no cut of the development funding. It’s dark times we live in when companies stop allowing pledge sites to take a percentage and use that money toward the game’s development.

Now Star Citizen is $142,000,000.00
in donations for a game that’s actually succeeding where as many other Kickstarter projects have or are beginning to run out of funding and are failing.

The pledgers, developers and Kickstarter have no fault in this. It’s not because they didn’t plan, employ or develop well enough. It’s that Star Citizen has been so successful independently, it leaves no room for others to succeed.

So please, more Chris Roberts gif, meme and jpg’s. Because that all CIG has been doing. Selling jpg ships to people and $142 million in donations, an industry record mind you, are the real villains in this whole Kickstarter failure. /s

Reader
Droniac

Wow. You even included the usual “Star Citizen was Kickstarter first” nonsense! That’s detailed /s man!

You must have put in some painstaking research on SC-trolls in their natural habitat. Hope you didn’t have to follow Derek Smart.

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

A thumbs up for you sir! You know what I’ve been through!

Reader
Loyal Patron
Rottenrotny

You know what they say about fools and their money.

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

Aand many of us will continue to give him money lol.

Reader
Patreon Donor
Schlag Sweetleaf

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

Drink it? We’re already playing it!

luxundae
Reader
Loyal Patron
Patreon Donor
Kickstarter Donor
luxundae

From the MMO side, I think we still don’t have any fully finished results from a crowdfunded title, which makes it a little hard to get too excited about new ones recently. We’ve also seen a large number of teams fold in the attempt to get to a finished product, or sort of trundle along with no clear plan (TUG).

From the non-MMO side, I think we’ve seen a number of huge successes. I’m thinking things like Banner Saga, Pillars of Eternity, Tides of Numenera, Divinity Original Sin, Planetary Annihilation, Obduction, Grim Dawn, Armello, some of the Shadowrun games, some of the Double Fine games, etc. But I think we’ve also scratched a number of itches on that front and don’t necessarily want to spend tons of money to get new games along those lines again this year.

I mean, a lot of us have wanted spiritual sequels to things like Myst, Total Annihilation, Planescape Torment, etc. for years (or, *gulp*, decades). We finally had those opportunities, and we jumped at them! But…we have those things now. We aren’t as hungry. I know that I, personally, am now more interested in spending smaller amounts of money to back research and development of smaller, more experimental games. Here I’m thinking things like AI War II, The Black Glove, Project Gorgon, Raindrop, The Realm Game, Anthymn, Origins of Malu, Elegy for a Dead World, Storium, Unwritten: That Which Happened, etc. The common theme among those is that very few of them held successful crowdfunding rounds. The vast majority failed (sometimes multiple times), or succeeded only with drastically reduced scope and budget. So I think that that is still the cool part of crowdfunding…that these sorts of experimental projects do sometimes get funded…but I also thinks it means that much less money will be coming in.

Reader
Francis Baud

Well this golden age of crowdfunding lasted just long enough to make some awesome indie projects possible (CF, CU, SC, DU…).

Reader
Patreon Donor
Kickstarter Donor
agemyth 😩

We don’t know if those are awesome because they are horribly unfinished.

Reader
Francis Baud

I agree that they’re unfinished projects, I think that’s the beauty of open-development though.

Vaeris
Reader
Vaeris

I have no real interest in MMO kickstarters anymore. That’s not to say that I don’t have any interest in what some of them are trying to accomplish. I just have far too many other gaming hobbies (board gaming, miniature gaming) that I can send that money toward and get a far more expedient “having fun” return.

Equally so for single player games. Harebrained Schemes has knocked it out of the park with all 3 Shadowrun games and I am “anticipating” the Battletech game they have coming. I’ve backed all 4 of those and will continue to back SP video games coming from them.

Reader
Scrungle

Makes me miss the good ole days of EA pumping out garbage.

Reader
Patreon Donor
Schlag Sweetleaf

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

We can all laugh but what happens when he actually finishes the game?

We’ll pretend it wasn’t us, melt in with the player base and enjoy Star Citizens success? Oh, okay!

Estranged
Reader
Kickstarter Donor
Estranged

Zander, he will “finish” the game in some fashion. Doesn’t mean it will be good.

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

Because you already know how “good” it will be. Gotcha

Estranged
Reader
Kickstarter Donor
Estranged

Nope, didn’t say that at all.

Godnaz
Reader
Godnaz

Are you saying you have doubts? If so why?

deekay_plus
Reader
Patreon Donor
deekay_plus

i like how you picked a pic where he looks super coked out and drunk. lol. >>

deekay_plus
Reader
Patreon Donor
deekay_plus

reminds me mandate released the video this morning that looks worse than gameplay of the same thing from 2 or 3 years ago.

don’t call me kickstarter devs, i’ll call you.