Talking to Cryptic about Neverwinter’s new Stronghold PvP

    
11

We’re on the horn with Cryptic Lead Designer Scott Shicoff and Senior Content Designer John Hopler to talk about Neverwinter’s brand-new Stronghold siege PvP mode. Could you start by discussing the demand for and feedback on large-scale PvP demand within the playerbase?

Scott Shicoff: As with all living games, Neverwinter is constantly adding new things for players to experience. With the release of Neverwinter: Strongholds, we added a new way for the players to come together and grow as a guild. To further expand upon this concept, stronghold siege delivers a way for the guild to show how they operate as a unit against other players, while also leveraging the progress they’ve made together in the PvE mode. From the beginning stages of planning Neverwinter: Strongholds, we felt that this large-scale PvP game would tie the whole experience into a complete package.

When we played this mode within the studio, we found that even people who didn’t normally play PvP would have a lot of fun contributing to the battle with their guild-mates.
As for feedback within the playerbase, we got a lot of positive response during alpha testing, and are excited to see what people think now that it is live.

Can you provide any numbers or statistics as to how many of the game’s guilds have taken advantage of strongholds? How many guilds are both equipped with a stronghold and large enough to participate in these new fights?

Scott Shicoff: We can’t confirm the exact number of guilds that are participating in strongholds at this time, but we know there are plenty. When we were designing the 20v20 PvP mode, we knew that we wanted to include as many players as possible. That meant we couldn’t require all 20 players from one guild to be online at the same time. Also, if you needed to field all 20 from one guild, smaller guilds wouldn’t be able to participate. To solve this, we decided that as long as you were in any guild, you could queue for stronghold siege.

The stronghold that is chosen to represent a given side is based on whichever guild is predominantly represented on that side. If all guilds on a side are equally represented, one of the most represented will be chosen at random. If all members of a guild queue up at approximately the same time, the system will try to put them all on a single side (up to 20 players).

WildStar recently attempted a similar PvP feature with warplots and 40v40 battles. The developers anticipated massive participation in those, and yet the feature has been largely neglected by the community. Other than a smaller size (20v20), how do you think Neverwinter’s new PvP mode will fare better?

John Hopler: Many PvP games are built to appeal only to players who already enjoy PvP. Stronghold siege was designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides rewards that can be enjoyed by both PvP fans and PvE players. The way we crafted our 20v20 battles makes it easier for players to participate. You don’t need to be part of a large, hardcore PvP guild in order to join. It’s still very much a PvP game, but we want players who are traditionally PvE-only to dip their toes in. We think they’ll enjoy it once they’re in the pool.

How long do you anticipate an average 20v20 siege to last?

John Hopler: The average match should last about 20 to 25 minutes. Matches may go a little longer for inexperienced teams. During the alpha tests, players picked up the basics of the game pretty quickly and match times fell in the expected range.

Do guilds have to rebuild their strongholds after a siege? What is at stake for both sides if they win or lose?

John Hopler: No. Nothing is at risk, except maybe some wounded pride.

We discussed the possibility of persistent damage to the stronghold early in the design process and decided against it. We want as many people as possible to play and enjoy stronghold siege and persistent damage is counterproductive to that goal. Risk-averse players will simply avoid it and even hard-core PvP players might find themselves unable to compete at the level they want after a few losses. We opted to go with a system that doesn’t punish players for participating.

Both teams receive rewards at the end of the match. The winning team gets a victory bonus, of course. The rewards include “Banners of the Fallen,” which can be redeemed for special PvP gear, and resource vouchers that can be used to further upgrade the guild’s stronghold.

Are there any systems in place to encourage feuds or revenge strikes between guilds?

Scott Shicoff: Not currently. We’re looking at future improvements to the system that will promote plenty of friendly competition between players.

Will this mode be making the transition to the Xbox as well? Are there technical challenges in bringing it to consoles?

Scott Shicoff: Stronghold siege will be coming to Xbox in a future update. Much of the heavy lifting for the system has already been done to bring this mode to PC. That being said, we are still looking into ways to improve team communication and coordination on Xbox One, as the platform limits the amount of players who can participate in group chat.
We’ve added additional information onto the stronghold siege map and UI so players can see, at a glance, the way the battle is moving. From this, they can make smart decisions that will help lead to victory!

Thanks for talking with us!

newest oldest most liked
Subscribe to:
FeveredDreamer
Guest
FeveredDreamer

There are a bunch of problems with Neverwinter generally speaking, even more when one is talking about PvP but this still seems like a great idea and a potentially really fun addition to the game.

Shadanwolf
Guest
Shadanwolf

-matches
-20 people 
-guild only

The real thing is DAOC

DaemonHardrod
Guest
DaemonHardrod

Sorenthaz Zulika_Mi_Nam I played this for the first time last week and my feelings are very similar to the reviewers, though I only made it to level 5 or 6. The combat is okay, but Skyforge is better, in my opinion. Wildstar is also quite good and will be f2p in a few days.

I didn’t have any feelings about the cash shop, since I only made it to a low level. The world didn’t feel that compelling, so maybe that’s why I stopped playing. The graphics/art seem a bit cheap. 

I could play further if I didn’t have so many other options with action combat these days. As far as an f2p mmorpg, there are more traditional titles like Rift and Allods (which has much better graphics in my opinion, but looks dead population-wise and I’m not sure how the cash shop is nowadays). 

But Neverwinter is worth a try at the price of free.

Zulika_Mi_Nam
Guest
Zulika_Mi_Nam

Sorenthaz Zulika_Mi_Nam Thanks! I was looking for a recent review.

BKone
Guest
BKone

Sorenthaz Zulika_Mi_Nam bad gfx?! heh I think Cryptic is pretty fine in the gfx department. They follow the good ole AD&D style and not Blizzard’s cartoon style (and that might upset some players roflmao…).

Sorenthaz
Guest
Sorenthaz

Zulika_Mi_Nam It didn’t live up to the hype with its major launch woes and cash shop practices.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8D69cxc-0I is something I found that’s about 2 weeks old if you can stand the commentary.

Jmerithew87
Guest
Jmerithew87

Zulika_Mi_Nam I played at launch, and “bots and lockboxes” sums it up pretty well from what I remember, but it’s been a long time, so things may have changed.

Zulika_Mi_Nam
Guest
Zulika_Mi_Nam

I have thought about trying this out, but all I hear about are bots and lockboxes – or other gambling items.
Anyone have any experience with it?

schlag sweetleaf
Guest
schlag sweetleaf

Farg

Sorenthaz
Guest
Sorenthaz

Farg  They’re probably making up for when the Champions Online devs didn’t give MOP any details about upcoming content, only to do an exclusive interview with MMORPG.com shortly after about the Villain Onslaught stuff.  :p