MMO Mechanics: Innovating mechanics to refresh Guild Wars 2

    
76

I usually keep MMO Mechanics quite general by looking at several games as examples to highlight my point regarding the mechanics of choice in each article, but I have a different format in mind for this edition that I hope you’ll enjoy. I’m going to flip things around, instead using one game — and several mechanical examples — to construct my argument.

It’s no secret that I have Guild Wars 2 on the brain anyway, and with the recent April update being such a reformative hit, I felt inspired. I’ve always believed that innovating mechanics is the secret to MMO longevity and the recent quarterly update for Heart of Thorns is an excellent case study to show how mechanical tweaks specifically can refresh MMOs. In this edition, I’ll outline some of the changed mechanics that gave ArenaNet a newly invigorated playerbase and wide praise for the update.

gw2 03Using feedback to shape innovation

There’s nowhere better to begin than with a brief history of ArenaNet‘s development of its first GW2 expansion, Heart of Thorns, for those who aren’t familiar with the title. HoT introduced several new mechanics that significantly improved the endgame of GW2, including a new mastery system that allowed player experience and dedication to be reflected in-game and several combat mechanic enhancements that made characters more fluid in terms of role while also allowing each class to gain an improved skillset at endgame.

The expansion’s launch didn’t come off without a hitch or two, though, and I documented in my launch diary back in October that ANet had even then started to iteratively correct some of the most pressing gripes of the community. It started within a week of launch, when the development team scanned complaints and feedback on the official forums and the game’s Reddit to shape the most immediate pipeline for fixes after the expansion launch. This sweep highlighted that personal story prerequisites were immersion-breakingly difficult to obtain in the natural exploration of the expansion zone and its story, and also that the new specialization point system needed reforming in order to make elite specializations easier to obtain.

The job certainly wasn’t over there, especially since the expansion left a vocal proportion of players feeling dissatisfied with the direction the expansion took the title in and believing that the studio’s priorities weren’t aligned with their own. Frustrations mounted over time as players perceived that development in new areas, such as raiding, happened as development slowed in other key areas, seeing delays and cancellation of some highly requested improvements to WvW, fractals, PvP maps, and the new zone. Fast-forward to the recent April update that started to smooth over the issues: Mike O’Brien recently took up the Game Director role again and used the opportunity to refocus on reactive and iterative development that was lighter on the promise front yet weightier when it comes to delivery.

gw2 02Practical implementation of feedback

What GW2 players are experiencing with the April update is the result of responsive development, and I was particularly interested in how both old and new mechanics were reforged due to player feedback. Every area of the game was impacted, and although the changes varied in scope, most of them were very welcome and warmly received. Access to the new HoT mechanics has been made instant too with the introduction of a free level 80 booster for every expansion owner, unleashing the best mechanics that GW2 has to offer immediately to those who have purchased the access rather than putting them through the admittedly short grind to 80. The token can be trailed on as many characters as a player wishes, so players gain a solid understanding of how endgame might function with any given profession before committing too, which is an excellent mechanic to encourage lapsed players to have a fresh look at what certain builds can do.

I was particularly taken with how iterating on core mechanics has opened up the game and made fun that much easier to find: The newest level 80 zone that was a fundamental part of HoT‘s launch has had a major mechanical overhaul. The inbuilt reward systems are less rigid and railroady, giving players more frequent and attractive rewards for the effort they put in. ANet’s anti-farming diminishing returns mechanics have been axed in the expansion content because it was getting in the way of the natural running of the content and affecting rewards that could be earned by players. Making these areas much more explorable and rewarding has had a visible impact on zone population from my perspective, making the content in turn that bit easier to run because it’s simpler to find some company to do so.

One of the most contentious content types in the game is WvW: Players have been waiting for a significant length of time for reform in this department. Improved reward mechanics that equally benefit secondary support roles have been introduced, incentivising a much higher uptake for WvW as one part of a two-prong plan to improve combatant populations. A new ability line has introduced mechanics that make looting and preparing for WvW much easier too, allowing players to stay in the action with far fewer distractions. These small mechanic improvements precede the reintroduction of Alpine Borderlands: Desert has now become a live testing ground for some of the changes players have been urging ANet to make, meaning that continued feedback is available to the WvW dev team to help this long-neglected content.

gw2 00Lessons moving forward

I’ve hit on only a few ways that ArenaNet has used direct player feedback and clever mechanics to make the expansion much more palatable to GW2 fans. Staying on the pulse is one thing, but proactive, reactionary improvements to mechanics are key to healthy MMOs. It hasn’t been a smooth first expansion for the game by any stretch of the imagination, but focusing on the grievances of players and adding in a generous helping of good old-fashioned incentives in those mechanics is proving to be a good recipe for the team moving forward.

I wonder if lessons have been taken on as the company proceeds to develop its next expansion: Players have responded well to ArenaNet’s iterative approach not just because it proves that the company is listening but also because the resultant mechanics are much smarter. MMOs naturally benefit from encouraging logins and incentivising active play, so I hope that ANet keeps improving the mechanics that switch off significant sectors of the playerbase to create the version of HoT that the bulk of players want to play. Often, expansions are hard-pressed to deliver plenty of newness and excitement, but I hope that this expansion has shown that improving existing mechanics should never be forgotten in the pursuit of meeting scheduled delivery expectations and meeting financial expectations.

One thing that I would love to see continue is the current news delivery format that ArenaNet is using. Reddit AMA threads are great ways to content drop interactively, allowing for hard-hitting, immediate feedback before development is totally committed to a set path. I prefer the recent lack of hard promises because it allows the team time and reasonable scope to deliver a sensible, largely timely update rather than rushing through checklists by a set date. The focus is on iterative development pairing alongside the new developments to keep up a stream of new surprises and hooks that are well supported by updated mechanics that don’t bog a player down or disincentive play.

gw2 01Over to you!

It’s not at all surprising that fans have reacted so much more positively to this expansion than they had previously. When outdated and unwelcome mechanics are improved to remove long-standing barriers to play, players can actually appreciate the content that’s regularly delivered to its maximum potential. I’m hoping that this approach continues, that ArenaNet grows as a result, and that other development teams take note of how the vocal population has so quickly changed the beat of its drum as far as the expansion is concerned.

What do you think? Should developers focus more on delivering new content or improving existing mechanics? What puts you off in terms of mechanics, and do you think a developer could win you back with some iterative changes? What constitutes iteration and what is mere reactive panic? If you’re a Guild Wars 2 fan, what do you think of the update? Have your say in the comments.

MMOs are composed of many moving parts, but Massively’s Tina Lauro is willing to risk industrial injury so that you can enjoy her mechanical musings. MMO Mechanics explores the various workings behind our beloved MMOs. If there’s a specific topic you’d like to see dissected, drop Tina a comment or send an email to tina@massivelyop.com.
newest oldest most liked
Subscribe to:
Tina Lauro
Guest
Tina Lauro

CistaCista  Aww, thanks! ^.^

ManastuUtakata
Guest
ManastuUtakata

SteveLazarowitz ManastuUtakata BalsBigBrother 
“Not sure where you get information that the patch wasn’t well received…”
I never made any such claim.

SteveLazarowitz
Guest
SteveLazarowitz

ManastuUtakata SteveLazarowitz BalsBigBrother I play the game. I’m watching map chat. I belong to a very large guid. Before the patch everyone with a seething mass of anger. That’s pretty much gone. I don’t see how anyone paying attention can say this patch wasn’t well received. There are people who have been consistently negative on Anet for months on the forums who thanked Anet for the patch. There may be a couple of holdouts, but the majority of people posting seem quite happy with the patch, as does the majority of my guild as does the majority of map chat. Not sure where you get information that the patch wasn’t well received, but I haven’t seen even a bit of indication about it.

Superbrak
Guest
Superbrak

schmidtcapela ManastuUtakata breetoplay HidingCat BalsBigBrother I volunteer! Let me get my lab coat…

BalsBigBrother
Guest
BalsBigBrother

breetoplay BalsBigBrother dragonwhimsy yes I am aware they are mostly posted for fun but I see the negativity and unhappiness of the path Anet are going down elsewhere, expressed by other folks.  I wouldn’t have used it as my example but it was the easiest and most succinct way to show what I saw elsewhere as opposed to posting  links to threads that people would then have to trawl through to reach the same point :-)

ManastuUtakata
Guest
ManastuUtakata

SteveLazarowitz ManastuUtakata BalsBigBrother 
/strawman. I am merely suggesting not to put weight on what is said on any forum or what is /upvoted (or /downvoted). As it may or may not reflect how the players feel collectively.
For example, out of the two /upvotes for my comment, one of them isn’t even remotely sincere. As he or she is posting *3rd party solicitations before the moderation (also see: spam bot). Therefore, you should never hold /upvotes as real evidence of anything as you appear to be doing. Just saying.
*Note: No, not Karl.

DugFromTheEarth
Guest
DugFromTheEarth

I really wish Anet would implement a more permanent way to “portal to a friend”. They have given out a small handful of limited use items that will do this over the various months, but on a day to day basis, Im finding myself constantly wishing that I could do this, or have someone else portal to me instead. Tons of people dont have 100% world completion, or do much of the story to level up. Its just a hassle now, an unneeded speed bump. Slap a 60 min cooldown on it to keep it controlled, and all is good. If you wanted to be even more strict, just limit it to level 80 characters being able to portal. (better than not having it at all)

greywolfe_joystiq
Guest
greywolfe_joystiq

schmidtcapela Greaterdivinity tobascodagama it was truly frustrating that to enjoy gw2 properly, you literally had to have the game on one screen and an event timer website on the other screen.  not good design, in my opinion.

greywolfe_joystiq
Guest
greywolfe_joystiq

BritoBruno Greaterdivinity i never liked the hearts.
they never actually sold me any story or anything.  i’m aware the story was there, of course, but you could just gloss right over it by just being in the zone the heart was in and doing whatever your right-hand-panel told you to do.  it felt flat and uninteresting.  [i got one guy to 80, but i couldn’t find the will to do it again.  much less try and do the dungeons and so on that were severely overtuned unless you were in a group that knew exactly what it was doing.]

Superbrak
Guest
Superbrak

Greaterdivinity Exactly. As much as I appreciate the vast improvements from the patch, they also serve to highlight the bad stuff they didnt/cant fix… like the zone design. Feels like they were designed with Masteries required to make exploration tolerable rather than easier. It’s quite aggravating.