Two government agencies are now squabbling over ethics allegations in Activision-Blizzard cases

Fighty smashy!

The Activision-Blizzard sexual discrimination and harassment lawsuit is back in the news this week, but for an unexpected reason. Readers will recall that the California DFEH, which is pursuing one of the lawsuits against the gaming company on behalf of victims, had filed an objection to the proposed settlement between the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Activision-Blizzard. But this past Friday, the EEOC filed its opposition to the DFEH’s objection on conflict of interest grounds, as apparently two of the DFEH attorneys who had been working on that case also used to work for the EEOC and at one point contributed to its similar case.

In its heavily redacted opposition, EEOC claims the DFEH violated Rule 1.11(a)(2) of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, which prevents an attorney from working on a case that he or she had worked on before at a different government agency without appropriate permission and screening. In other words, if the claim is true, the two lawyers might actually have filed an objection to a settlement they had previously worked on. According to the EEOC, the entire DFEH legal department should therefore be barred from working on the case, not just the two former EEOC staffers, though apparently those two have already resigned and been replaced and it’s not clear whether screening ever took place; the federal agency also argues that the DFEH’s intervention into the settlement should be tossed on the grounds that it was the product of “prohibited representation.” Conveniently for the EEOC, that would mean the settlement would go through unopposed.

It’s hard to say what exactly the EEOC hopes to achieve here or which workers or victims are being helped; we’ve previously covered labor organizers’ skepticism about the EEOC’s motivations in regard to the settlement, and it’s not a stretch to wonder whether we’re just watching a state-versus-federal turf war where the only winner is Activision-Blizzard.

Source: GIbiz
Apparently, the Central District Court of California denied the DFEH’s application for an expedited intervention in the EEOC’s settlement; the court ordered the two sides to parlay over the jurisdictional tug-of-war and then refile under a more reasonable timeline. It might all be moot in the end, as the Communication Workers of America union, which is party to one of the lawsuits pending against Activision-Blizzard, has now also filed an objection to the EEOC’s settlement, arguing that the settlement figure is too low.
Previous articleSWG Legends has brought back the Galactic Moon Festival for Halloween – with new stuff
Next articleThe Daily Grind: How do you protect yourself from scammers in MMORPGs?

No posts to display

oldest most liked
Inline Feedback
View all comments