US Court of Appeals upholds decision that a RuneScape player’s muting did not violate free speech

    
33

The 3rd Circuit US Court of Appeals has effectively squashed any further action by one Amro Elansari, a RuneScape player who claimed that Jagex’s muting of him in-game was a violation of his right to free speech.

Readers will recall that the original case, as heard by U.S. Eastern District Judge Mark A. Kearney, was thrown out on the grounds that free speech protection applies only to government parties and not private companies, which have the authority to not provide people a platform for whatever bile they speak or type out. Elansari attempted to appeal the case in a hand-written lawsuit, asking for damages in the amount of “whatever the jury sees fit” as well as a removal of the muting.

The circuit judges ultimately reasoned that Elansari’s treatment was nothing unique to others who had been similarly muted and that nothing that happened to him was anything close to a violation of federal anti-discrimination laws. So let this whole thing be yet another nice reminder that free speech does not mean speech without consequences on a privately owned platform.

Advertisement
Previous articleThe Daily Grind: What’s the most indispensable tool you use to play MMOs, other than the platform itself?
Next articleStar Trek Online: Tenth anniversary giveaways, lifetime sale, and story leak

No posts to display

33 Comments
newest
oldest most liked
Inline Feedback
View all comments