Why I Play: Multiplayer sandbox Eco is so much more than just an ecology simulator

    
12

I’ve been struggling to come up with a succinct way to describe Eco. The game was recently the subject of a Whatever Happened To entry on this very site, an article that coincidently went live the same day I purchased and started playing the game with an established online community. My initial impression of the game was that it’s Minecraft on steroids, but after more playtime, I feel that term doesn’t do justice to this little-known gem. I’ve been trying to come up with a better description ever since.

A little backstory: In 2015, Eco doubled its Kickstarter goal of $100,000, and while this sum is a far cry from the totals raised by more famous personalities, it was enough to get the project going. And it’s still pushing ahead today as an early-access title on Steam.

So what is it, exactly? It’s a building game. It’s also a sandbox, but not exactly. It’s a survival game, but you need to work together with other players to do so. It’s an ecology simulator. It’s a civics lesson. It’s a study of human behavior. It’s a player-run economy. It’s a classroom tool. It’s an addiction. Oh, and did I mention the world you’re creating will be struck by a meteor? Unless you progress to the point that you can counteract it and don’t destroy the environment in the process, of course. And while it’s not exactly a traditional MMORPG, it does allow for the use of small-to-mid-size private servers (like Minecraft) with a one-time purchase price.

Eco was originally envisioned as a tool to teach kids about the impact human actions have on the environment. In fact, for a time developer Strange Loop partnered with the University of Illinois for prototyping, project direction, and ecosystem design. This influence is still clearly seen within Eco, as the environment is the key component around which all other systems revolve. Actions have ecological consequences. Chopping down trees and building factories increase CO2 and cause the sea level to rise. Over-hunting a certain species can have ripple effects on other animals and biomes throughout the planet. Even trampling around or leaving logging debris lying on the ground can change the presentation of the environment. All of these implications can be tracked with charts and graphs made available via a web service that runs on the same server as the game world.

It’s with this delicate balance in mind that players set forth building a civilization with one another, using the natural resources of the planet to advance both individually and collectively. The negative effects of progress can be combated somewhat. Logging yields seeds that can be used to re-plant trees. Organic material that might otherwise be considered waste can be composted and used to make fertilizer. Laws can be proposed and enacted to protect plant and animal life.

But while the balance of life must be preserved, at its heart Eco is a cooperative game about progress.

Indeed, if everybody on the server decides to remain isolated, chances are that society will not be able to progress to the point of becoming technologically advanced enough to shoot down the approaching meteor. Therefore, the game is equipped with a complex economics model that is easily accessible to low-level players (the “store” counter can be crafted at the very first workbench) and can progress from a barter system to a global currency-based model as players advance. That is, of course, if someone builds a bank.

Like game devs, we are learning the hard way that balance is the most difficult thing to achieve.
Experience and skill progression rules are left mainly up to the server admin but are best balanced when specialization points are limited so that one player cannot be entirely self-sufficient. For the first playthrough on our server, this has been our biggest issue. We erred on the side of too much experience gain, and it’s killed the economy somewhat. Why spend your hard-earned coin on something that you can do yourself? Like game devs, we are learning the hard way that balance is the most difficult thing to achieve.

One system that was recently added to Eco involves the creation of laws and government. Players can collectively decide on a constitution that determines how laws are proposed and approved. Once we had our constitution drafted, I proposed an experimental law that would protect a certain species of tree from being harvested for wood. Depending on the laws proposed, players can change how the game rules work on the fly, so once my law passed, any player who attempted to chop at one of the protected trees was met with the system message this tree is protected by the old-growth redwood protection act. The game no longer allowed any harm to come to the tree. Other enforcements, such as fines, are also possible. Laws can also be used for such things as creating districts (where laws specific to those districts can then be created) and official government positions (with pay!).

It seems strange that I’ve gotten this far into the column without even mentioning building or crafting since, at first glance, you could be easily fooled into thinking that Eco is a Minecraft clone. While they’re certainly an important aspect of the game, crafting and building are more a means to an end, not the end-goal of the game itself. Early on, you craft to survive. In the mid-game, you craft to make money and build infrastructure. Later, you craft in an attempt to counteract the meteor. But while building and crafting are typically the day-to-day tasks you do to propel the game forward, they seem to get lost in the larger purpose at times, and that’s a good thing in my mind. One of the reasons I never played Minecraft was that I could never get my head around the “crafting for the sake of crafting” mentality.

The crafting system in Eco is all about specializations. Anybody can do the basics of a profession (hunting, gathering, farming, logging, campfire cooking), but XP stars must be spent in order to specialize in one or more of these skills. Skill lines do not progress unless a player has chosen to specialize in that specific line. The further a player progresses within a skill line, the greater the variety of things that are craftable within that line and the less effort it takes to craft them.

Since I lived in the woods, I specialized in logging and carpentry. I can craft a load of lumber or a birchwood bench with the best of ‘em, but my cooking is pretty much limited to charred campfire beets. Therefore, it’s important to get the economy going early. Players will collectively progress more quickly if they’re trading their specialty goods for other players’ specialty goods.

While Eco has impressed me with its overall vision and the level of detail to which it’s gone in developing systems to enhance the realism of cultivating a society of individuals, there are a few negatives. For one, it’s very GPU intensive. I had no issues running it on my Nvidia 2080 Super, but my son wasn’t as lucky with his 3-year-old Dell laptop. He experienced several crashes prior to manually tweaking the graphics settings downward.

Also, the behavior of the animals is wonky. Deer roam the streets in town. One animal occasionally inexplicably multiplies into three. At one point, I witnessed an alligator flopping on the beach. Its final flop was a transformative one, as the alligator mutated into a turtle before my eyes!

In one of the more humorous episodes, one of the farmers on our server logged in to notice that his tractor was missing. With object permissions, stealing someone’s tractor wasn’t a possibility, so the mods ran a command to track the object and found it at the bottom of the ocean, without any explanation of how it got there. The game just transported it there for no reason! I’m hoping that these issues, especially the performance issues, are mostly a symptom of the game being early access and will be tuned as time goes on.

While your mileage with Eco will depend largely on how well the group of people on your server try to work together, I found the game to be a charming little surprise. It’s so different than most multiplayer sandbox games in what it’s trying to accomplish, and you can tell that the educational foundation is still there. But Eco has long since outgrown simply teaching us about the environment. It has branched into economic and legal systems that tap into how groups of people interact with each other, work together, and try to accomplish goals. I look forward to watching this one grow up!

There’s an MMO born every day, and every game is someone’s favorite. Why I Play is the column in which the Massively OP staff members kick back and reminisce about all their favorite MMOs. Whether it’s the new hotness or an old fan favorite loaded with nostalgia, each title we cover here tugs at our heartstrings and keeps us coming back for more.
Advertisement

No posts to display

newest oldest most liked
Subscribe to:
Saluka
Reader
Saluka

It’s best experienced by a group of people. Prefably ones you know. It’s good while it lasts but once the lazer is already build people pretty much abandon the game after which is a shame considering alot of work you have to put into it. But I liked watching towns and places getting slowly built up. We had fines and a dump and sub areas that had seperate laws. It was interesting.

Reader
Croquantes

When I play on an Official server, sometimes I just like to log in every couple days and see what people are building and how the world has changed, run around a bit and take in the sights, and then log out.

MilitiaMasterV
Reader
MilitiaMasterV

I’ve wanted to play this, but I refuse to use Steam, and judging from this article, it’s just people playing ‘God’…with their own servers, instead of being a tool to learn the consequences of actions like it was intended. Climate change is happening, and it’s not a ‘joke’ or a ‘myth’, but humans are headed towards their own extinction level event by purposely treating their own planet poorly…because most of them think ‘Well, I won’t be here to put up with it.’…because all they care about is themselves…and don’t think of others…

Reader
Croquantes

I don’t usually play on private servers, it’s more fun/challenging to play on Official Servers where there’s not only chaos, but drama that arises from conflict (usually between settlements or groups of players) and since there’s no combat, that conflict is always resolved in surprising and interesting ways.

Reader
Loyal Patron
Patreon Donor
DeadlyAccurate

This is on my wishlist, but one question I have is whether the material usage is reflective of the quantity you’d reasonably get from the object. For example, in ARK, you basically end up eating an entire dinosaur every day. It would be difficult to keep the ecology in balance if you’re having to eat 10x your body weight in food every day. The same for tree chopping. Do you end up wiping out the Amazon Rainforest just to build a decent-sized house?

Reader
Croquantes

You can’t really build a house by yourself, I mean you can, but it’s too basic to be much use. Due to the limited skill points, most of the things you harvest or mine are going to be traded because you don’t have the skills to refine them.

When you DO get the skills to refine materials… you’ll need to trade most of the refined materials for the ingredients needed to make them in the first place. Since everyone else is as dependent on you as you are on them you can’t price gouge, or other people will just jack of their prices in response.

So sure, you can totally log an entire forest, but you’ll probably trade most of it away so you can buy some fancy brick to replace your wooden hut.

EmberStar
Reader
EmberStar

It looks interesting, but I wouldn’t be able to play it without a single player mode. My play times are erratic, and even when I can I might not play the same game regularly.

Games like Ark and Conan Exiles are only playable because there’s an offline mode where time stops when I’m not playing. Otherwise, there would be no point in taming or building anything – even if griefers didn’t find a way to burn everything to ground, it’s likely that between one session and the next time I have time to log in, everything I own would have decayed and all my pets starved.

I’m glad this game exists, and it’s nice that it seems to have a focus besides “kill everything.” I think part of the reason I try to play survival games at all is that there’s things to work towards besides increasing the body count. Taming creatures, breeding them, harvesting resources, building.

Just building is challenging, because I don’t want stone Borg Cubes – I want a base that *looks* nice. Ideally I would be clever enough to lay it out so that it makes tasks more efficient too, but… “Okay, who left the giant murdercrab parked in the middle of the forge? And why are there otters in the armory? Who’s responsible for this mess? Oh right. It was me.”

Reader
Kickstarter Donor
NeoWolf

It’s a really cool game, but I fundamentally have an issue with persistent “like” universes that end, because if I’m enjoying something and investing a cr** load of time into it, I don’t WANT it to end.

Also although you absolutely can play this solo, it kinda sucks, it really really comes into its own when played multiplayer.

Reader
Croquantes

One of the developer goals now is to set up an endgame of building a utopia so that the server has a reason to continue after the meteor is stopped

Fisty
Reader
Fisty

This game always tempts me, and this article hasn’t helped. Still, the one thing that holds me back is whether the online community is large enough, cool enough,varied enough.

Reader
Patreon Donor
Loyal Patron
Minimalistway

Thank you for the article, i like how the whole world have a dead-end and if the server did not progress and survive the world itself will end, this is a good way to design a co-op game, with economy and specialized players, i like that.

I hope there will be streams for the game, i want to see all of that in action.