Pokemon Go’s New Zealand rollbacks show Niantic is more concerned with local law than actual safety

    
8

Good news: New Zealanders have had their Pokemon Go PokeStop and Gym radius restored to 80 meters, exactly what the community has been asking for in its demands for the return of COVID-19 changes to the game that would keep players safe and boost the game’s accessibility for rural and disabled gamers.

The bad news is that Niantic reinstituted the changes only in the region, only for a limited time, and only because the country is in COVID lockdown again following a single case of COVID. Meanwhile, here in the United States, we saw over 160,000 new COVID cases just yesterday, but in spite of telling protesters that player safety is part of its core mission, the company has made no move to alter the game here at home and indeed still encourages strangers to gather in small areas for a video game.

As Gamepress journalist @RyanSwg recently suggested, it seems as if Niantic is responding only to legal mandates, regardless of the actual safety situation. He put it more forcefully than that:

He’s not the only POGO personality to note this troubling issue. We know of a few personalities talking to Niantic’s “task force,” such as ZoeTwoDots, but some have already warned us not to get our hopes up that Niantic will turn around its public relations debacle. Trainer Tip’s Nicholas Oyzon has already requested that fans choose not “turn on him […] if Niantic doesn’t change anything after the talk.” That doesn’t bode well for the game, especially as members of the community, such as POGO PvP site pvpoke.com, start turning towards Pokemon Unite, should Niantic continue to run the ship aground. Which, considering the whaling vessel the company is named after, seems far too appropriate.

We’ve written at length about the rollback, boycott, and Niantic’s “painfully deficient response”; you can get caught up here:

Massively OP’s Andrew Ross is an admitted Pokemon geek and expert ARG-watcher. Nobody knows Niantic and Nintendo like he does! His Massively on the Go column covers Pokemon Go as well as other mobile MMOs and augmented reality titles!
Advertisement

No posts to display

8
LEAVE A COMMENT

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most liked
Subscribe to:
Reader
Loyal Patron
Patreon Donor
Kickstarter Donor
elenie

I have always hated the tiny interaction radius and don’t see why they are so opposed to upping it anyway? It hardly gets rid of the need to walk places, and I don’t understand what Niantic get out of forcing players to cross major roads, encourage them to run to make a raid, or go into dangerous areas with the radius being so small.
Really wish there was a good PoGO alternative made by some studio other than Niantic since I do love location based gameplay.

Reader
Harbinger_Kyleran

What I’ve not figured out is why is the company taking their position?

Corporations usually do things for financial gain, so where is it here?

Reader
Wilhelm Arcturus

80km seems… a bit big. 80m?

Turing fail
Reader
Patreon Donor
Turing fail

An over-abundance of caution…

Reader
notReginald VelJohnson

Why is anyone shocked? Corporations exist to make money, and one way to lose money is to become unnecessarily entangled in legal battles. No corporation, ever, cares about people.

Reader
Dankey Kang

Morals are cool and all but they won’t buy you a bigger house, or another new car.

EmberStar
Reader
EmberStar

Or a house made out of other smaller houses, which are in turn constructed of bricks formed from compressed dollar bills. Which is what the CEO of most corporations is actually after. (Capitalism! When enough, is NEVER enough!)