Flameseeker Chronicles: What would a mobile Guild Wars 2 look like?

    
26

Ever wished Tyria could fit in your pocket? That dream could one day become a reality. A couple of weeks ago, we heard rumblings that ArenaNet may be looking into producing a version of Guild Wars 2 for mobile. This isn’t even the first time it has hinted at this possibility; we know that at least one of the projects it cancelled following its layoffs back in February was a mobile title. Given how successful ArenaNet’s parent company NCsoft has been with mobile versions of some of its other popular MMORPG franchises, such as Lineage II and Aion, I think it’s easy to see why it would be interested in investigating a mobile version of Guild Wars 2.

Now, I don’t know anything more about this than you do, and I’ve never developed a game for mobile, let alone an MMORPG. Regardless, I thought it would be a fun mental exercise for this week’s Flameseeker Chronicles to design a theoretical Guild Wars 2 for mobile.

First of all, I think that we can eliminate crossplay as a possibility from the get-go. I love the idea of a crossplay MMORPG that I can play with my friends who prefer different platforms, be that mobile or console, but I think that the PC version of Guild Wars 2 is going to require too many modifications to make it mobile friendly to be able to share a server and give all players an equal experience.

The biggest and most important change when porting a PC game to mobile, at least in my opinion, is the new control scheme. You have to come up with a way to move all of the functions that your players currently do with their keyboard to buttons on the screen. You’re also going from the accuracy of a mouse to a touchscreen where thumbs are clumsy and cover much of the view, so while most mouse functions can map directly to taps and gestures, it’s a delicate science.

The most obvious choice for a control scheme is to try to replicate the desktop experience as closely as possible. I’ve tried a few mobile MMOs, and a popular control scheme for games trying to mimic the desktop MMO experience is an over-the-shoulder chasecam those games generally employ, with the player dragging a finger around near the center of the screen to swing the camera around, much like clicking and dragging the mouse. It’s functional, and resembles the desktop version of Guild Wars 2 very closely, but it always feels clumsy to me – as if it’s shoehorning desktop controls into a phone where they don’t belong, instead of taking into account what works best for the medium.

What works better, in my experience, is an isometric or top-down perspective. The camera is set at a fixed height and angle above the character (a la Diablo), perhaps with the ability to zoom slightly and pivot. This perspective gets your character out of the way and makes all of the objects on screen more equal.

For our theoretical Guild Wars 2 mobile, switching the camera to isometric will mean some extra work to make sure the world looks right and functions correctly. To be honest, I can’t really imagine how some of those cramped and vertically layered Heart of Thorns maps would work in an isometric game. Also, some gamers feel that the isometric perspective disconnects them from their avatar, making them a tiny character that’s a little difficult to visually distinguish from the other friends and foes on the screen, which would be sad in a game where the characters have as much personality as they do in Guild Wars 2. In the end, though, if we want this game to work well, I think this would be the best choice.

Regardless of the camera style, the next control scheme decision is about movement. The two schemes that seem to be most popular are a virtual, console-style thumbstick and click-to-move. Click-to-move is great for Diablo-style ARPGs, where there are small maps populated with lots of little enemies that die quickly, but so much of Guild Wars 2 is about exploring expansive maps that I think tapping the edges of your screen would quickly become tiresome. The thumbstick could function just like the WASD keys, with a quick swipe to dodge in the swipe’s direction.

Another thing to consider is auto-move and auto-battle. These are extremely popular in mobile MMOs, bordering on ubiquity. I’ll state my biases here: I really don’t like auto-anything in MMOs. I think it’s because I’ve spent so much time despising leveling and gold farming bots in MMOs and wondering who actually enjoys playing an account he didn’t earn. Building the bot into the game seems like a great way to take the fun out of it.

That said, I’m not necessarily the target audience for a mobile MMO. A lot of people who regularly play mobile MMOs want these kinds of features and might be as turned off by their absence as I would be at their presence. If ArenaNet’s goal in making this port is to capture a new market, it’s not going to cater everything to their existing demographic; it’s going to cater to a different one.

Still, in a game so focused on exploration and dynamic events as Guild Wars 2, I’m not sure full movement automation is the best option. Perhaps a better option would be the ability to auto-run to a specific point of interest, waypoint, or heart that you can see on the map. This keeps the player engaged and in charge, without having to manually navigate using a mobile device’s cumbersome controls.

Of course, the ideal answer to all of these questions would be “all of the above.” In a perfect world, the player could choose whatever camera and movement schemes she prefers in the settings menu. This would no doubt mean a lot more work for the development team, but this is all theoretical anyway, so let’s dream big.

The next question is what parts of the game will be ported over. If we’re going to make our theoretical Guild Wars 2 mobile a true, small-screen Guild Wars 2 experience, I think it needs to launch with all of the story quests, maps, races, and classes that the PC version launched with. That’s a lot of content to chew through, and I think it’s perfectly acceptable to ask mobile players to work through that before an expansion, the same way PC players did. This also gives ArenaNet time to recoup some of its initial cost and evaluate projected income before continuing the process of porting the game to mobile. Random thought: Wouldn’t it be ironic if Guild Wars 2 mobile got a replay of Living World Season 1 before the PC did?

Another problem I see with this is that storage space is at a premium on mobile devices. My Guild Wars 2 desktop install is sitting at just below 43 GB, which is more than the total capacity of the average smartphone or tablet. Besides, the maximum app size allowed by the Google Play Store and Apple App Store is 4 GB. Sure, the game’s file size will shrink significantly as models and textures are downscaled for the smaller screen, but ultimately something more will need to be cut from the mobile version, and I think the most natural thing would be to cut a lot of the voice acting. This would be fine with me; I play mobile games on mute most of the time, and quite frankly, a lot of Guild Wars 2’s voice acting is nothing to write home about (I’m looking at you, Trahearne). That soundtrack, however, is top notch, so the more of that we can bring to the mobile version, the better.

Finally, there is the matter of the business model. This is a delicate subject because it can lead to pay-to-win tactics or exploitative marketing tactics. Honestly, though, I don’t think much change is needed here. Guild Wars 2 is already essentially free-to-play, which is a must for mobile games. I think some of the free account restrictions would need to be lifted for the mobile audience, but I think those should be reduced for the PC version too. It’s already got a healthy selection of cash shop cosmetics and convenience items. I can’t imagine how an energy system or any of the other usual mobile game shenanigans could fit into Guild Wars 2, and that’s just fine with me.

Crossplay may not be feasible, but cross promotion could be. Titles, minipets, and other cosmetics could be a simple and effective way to entice players to try both versions of the game. Letting players have outfits and other unlocks that they’ve purchased in one version of the game for free — or at least steeply discounted — in the other version, could also help incentivize players to populate both versions of Tyria.

So there’s our theoretical Guild Wars 2 mobile port. I think that mobile is definitely something worth exploring for any game company, and Guild Wars 2 could work in the format. It would by no means replace the PC game for me, but I would definitely spend some time in it. Putting a lot of ArenaNet’s resources into building a mobile game isn’t my favorite idea (I’ve argued before that brand recognition for ArenaNet and Guild Wars isn’t going to be strong in countries where mobile games are king), but when you look at NCsoft’s sales figures for mobile versus PC, it’s hard to argue with the idea that it would likely be a boon for the company.

I’ve also got some ideas for things ArenaNet could do with the Guild Wars IP other than porting Guild Wars 2 straight to mobile, but I’m out of time for now, so that will have to wait for another day. In the meantime, what would you want to see from a Guild Wars 2 mobile game?

Flameseeker Chronicles is one of Massively OP’s longest-running columns, covering the Guild Wars franchise since before there was a Guild Wars 2. Now penned by Tina Lauro and Colin Henry, it arrives on Tuesdays to report everything from GW2 guides and news to opinion pieces and dev diary breakdowns. If there’s a GW2 topic you’d love to see explored, drop ’em a comment!

26
LEAVE A COMMENT

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most liked
Subscribe to:
Mordyjuice
Reader
Mordyjuice

I imagine a mobile version of GW2 would look and be as enjoyable as dragging my atheist ass to church everyday.

Reader
Loyal Patron
Patreon Donor
Kickstarter Donor
Dean Greenhoe

Sounds great but I doubt they could pull this off with a version I would enjoy. Maybe when I can see the world from every angle just moving my device around. Only then will I feel immersed in a mobile world.

The future is bright.

Reader
Nate Woodard

Unless they made a Polymock game, I wouldn’t give two rips about a GW:Mobile game. It would work quite well if they did something like Polymock.

Aside from AQ3D and Villagers and Heroes(and I use these two games with a very loose aside…), there’s yet to be an MMO that I’ve actually enjoyed a mobile version of.

Still looking for one though. I’ve spent a third of my nights this past year in hotel rooms. Laptops for gaming aren’t my thing. I’d love a good mobile something or other to pass the time!

Reader
Loyal Patron
Kickstarter Donor
Patreon Donor
kgptzac

This is the right answer tbh. A mobile GW2 doesn’t necessarily mean it has to be a port. It can be a game set in GW universe with a genre that isn’t already too cliched on the mobile platform.

Reader
partiesplayin

It would look like another piece of mobile garbage I would never play.

Reader
Malcolm Swoboda

It isn’t appropriate for ~2019 mobile gaming.

What NCSoft could do is a console version with crossplay, or a less-direct Guild Wars mobile game that introduces mobile gamers to the setting and characters.

latorn
Reader
Kickstarter Donor
latorn

Seriously! Action camera mode already lets me play with a controller on PC, why they haven’t ported it to consoles yet is beyond me.

Reader
Nate Woodard

I’m not sure they’d have the success in all honestly.

Reader
Bruno Brito

It would be even more imbalanced, boring and shaved off. GW2 as it launched had a lot of potential, and to be fair, they did realize some of that.

The talent revamp, elite specs and boon/condition system should be completely redone.

I miss the old talent system, they coulda have improved on that.

But anyway, i don’t trust mobile nor NCSoft, and GW2 is already treading to become a pretty shallow MMO, so it would be that, but worse.

Reader
psytic

I d rather it be on consoles with crossplay. NCSofts mobile mmos are greedy lootbox filled auto questing trash.

Reader
Patreon Donor
Loyal Patron
Schlag Sweetleaf
quarrelsome quaggans.gif
Bree Royce
Staff
Bree Royce

I… I would buy this.

Reader
Nate Woodard

Dang it, Schlag! Every time…!!!

Reader
Anton Mochalin

I would actually like ArenaNet to make a GW2-themed mobile game. I’ve never imagined an MMO can be so good before playing GW2. So I’m not going to imagine what such a mobile game can be. But I would definitely not like it called GW2 Mobile because you can’t bring GW2 to mobile devices. GW2 is an artistic accomplishment and as such is supposed to be interacted with in some particular way. Call the new game Guild Wars 3, I don’t mind. But you can’t have GW2 Mobile.

Reader
Bruno Brito

You really have humble prospects, don’t you?

Reader
Anton Mochalin

What do you mean? GW2 is really an artistic achievement, the world is huge and beautiful and feels alive, the combat is fun, it is just very pleasant to be there, I haven’t seen that anywhere else. It’s a very good game.

Reader
Bruno Brito

I mean that GW2 may be an artistic achievement in your eyes, and hell, i like it, but it’s nowhere near some other games.

The world is beautiful, but it only feels alive until the events start repeating themselves. The combat is fun, but buggy and unbalanced.

Pleasantness is a subjective argument, and the rest of it is what you perceive to be.

GW2 is a decent game. Very good is a huuuuge stretch.

Reader
Anton Mochalin

Why don’t you just name a couple of those “some other games” and what you feel is so much better in them than in GW2 and we’ll discuss.

Repetitiveness of events is not a problem as there are so many of them and everytime there are different players around and a different number of them so the difficulty varies a lot.

Combat is so fun that those few bugs (in fact I’ve noticed just one everyone speaks about) though being irritating don’t ruin the experience. I’ve played all three “true action combat” MMOs (BDO, BnS, Tera) and a lot of action combat centered games like Borderlands and Warframe and Smite and Dota 2 and I found GW2 combat among the most entertaining.

Yes I’ve heard about it being “unbalanced” (never cared about it myself) but as we’ve already discussed even in games like Smite where the balance is super important there’s not much balance – and people still play them and I do play Smite’s Arena almost every day even though one third to half of the gods aren’t very useful in that mode. And a lot of people still play GW2’s unbalanced PvP and have fun with it – if it doesn’t really matter for Smite’s most played mode it matters even less for GW2’s PvP.

I think GW2 is just best for casual play. It’s just a beautiful world to f*ck around in. I’ve heard several vets/streamers complaining on TeaTime about people not interested much in raids but GW2’s playerbase isn’t there for raids. GW2 is more about enjoing the scenery and rez’ing random people.

Reader
Bruno Brito

ESO.

Combat is so fun that those few bugs (in fact I’ve noticed just one everyone speaks about) though being irritating don’t ruin the experience.

You don’t play Necromancer, do you?

Reader
Anton Mochalin

No, I play dual pistol Engineer.

Never played ESO but as it’s discussed a lot I’ve seen quite a lot of gameplay footage and from what I see combat is clunky (I don’t know how it feels but it looks clunky), characters look stupid and their movements are, again, clunky and the world doesn’t seem very attractive. The overall “production value” of both visuals and voice/sound is so much lower than in GW2 – but again, I never suspected an MMO can be so good before playing GW2. I’m well aware of the popularity of Elder Scrolls franchise and could never understand why it’s so popular – everything looks so bland and emotionless. ESO has that problem of everything looking like polished wood – stone buildings, ground, faces, metal and cloth armor, everything. For me ESO lacks in that most important aspect – the feel of the world. When I first heard of MMO genre it was that idea of the world “where you can just live”. Maybe ESO has perfect progression mechanics or quests or whatever but I wouldn’t call its world an artistic accomplishment and a place where I’d like to come to to just hang around for the sake of the world itself.

And the idea of subscriptions in a B2P game also seems a bit off.

Reader
Vincent Clark

Can I be placed in cryogenic sleep and awakened (however long it takes) when the mobile gaming thing has gone bust and people stop feeding the micro transaction/ slot machine/loot box systems that continue to kill the genre. Please?